Design & Publishing _/_ WEB _/_ The Web Design & Review Reader Critique Index _/_ You are reading a reader review

Reader Reviews of Web Sites

Fred follows up on
Joyce's review of Connect-focus on print

Okay, Joyce, we pretty much agree with your points... but my observation was in the overall "Positioning" of the site. The site seems to be more intended to gather information than purvey content. As you said, content is scarce, and what is there is very shallow content.
__ One suggestion I would make to Richard is to provide a "FEATURE" graphic that will help the reader a) focus on something important, and b) draw them into the content well visually.
__ Overall, the whole page has an overall "sameness" -- there's no stars, nor focal point. The branding and button bar is the only real visual rewards on the page, and they're bland enough to sink into the background. Yes, we clicked around, and landing on other pages jolts you out of the expected look.
__ A more subtle observation might be that this look of "sameness" translates in the reader's mind as "more work to do". Any time you present the reader with this much small text, they either WANT to read it, or they pass it by. What will make the reader WANT to read would be a visual image to hook the eye and stimulate curiosity, or some headline that entices.
__ I believe the site is simply positioned incorrectly. Promising "All the latest" then delivering repeated calls to "sign up" and "click here" is not the promise of "information".
Remember Richard: "Deliver the Dream" give them what they came for, and they'll sign up.
Now, go and visit I know -- a totally different positioning. However, notice how they provide a single, simple focal point (amongst all the SPAM) which draws you into their feature.
A strong lesson.



<- Back to the Reviews Index . / . Web Design & Review Front Page . / .Design Center News ->

Submit your website for review . / . Select a Web site and share your views

Note: If you would like to contact the reviewer, please copy the reference into a request.



Become a WebDesign reviewer, or have your site reviewed...
If you would like to do more than just a casual online form review, perhaps with examples, screen shots and make-over suggestions, please contact us. A good eye for design is hard to find, and many people can learn from your input. In exchange for your efforts, the site owner will thank you, and you'll be recognized by all the readers of WebDesign & Review. To get started, forward your first review overview, or proposal directly to: Be sure to include the URL of the website you are reviewing. You can POST your review by using the Website Review Form as well. If you'd like to publish tips, tricks, reviews, opinions, or otherwise share your expertise in the pages of WebDesign & Review then capture and read our "Readers Guidelines".

VIEWS EXPRESSED IN READER REVIEWS ARE NOT NECESSARILY THE VIEWS OR OPINIONS OF WEB DESIGN & REVIEW. WHEN READING THESE REVIEWS PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE SITE MAY HAVE BEEN UPDATED OR RENNOVATED SINCE THE REVIEW WAS WRITTEN. ALL WEB SITE REVIEWS ARE OPINION BASED AND SHOULD BE ACCEPTED AS THAT. REVIEWS ARE IN NO WAY INTENDED TO RECOMMEND ANY SITE. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE VIEWED AS LEARNING TOOLS FOR IMPROVEMENT. Thank you for visiting WebDesign & Review at Notes: The screen shots herein represent the copyrighted works of their respective owners, and are used here for editorial demonstration purposes. Permission has been granted to display and review all sites in WebDesign & Review by the website owners. Please read and be aware of our Legal Properties & Disclaimers document. Not all areas of the online environment allow special characters such as the registration and trademark marks. This file will alert you to proprietary works that cannot be duplicated or distributed. Copyright 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 Showker Graphic Arts, for the The Design & Publishing Center, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. WebDesign & Review, Pixelsmith, WebEye are all trademarks for The Design & Publishing Center. Other products mentioned in these pages are the registered trademarks of their respective owners.