Design & Publishing _/_ WEB _/_ The Web Design & Review Reader Critique Index _/_ Fred Critiques "Furry Tree Fan Zine"

Reader Reviews of Web Sites

Software makes all the difference... or breaks the site...
Next view takes us to the band selection page. WHOA! Let's clean this up. Your SerifPage Plus software is killing you! See all those table cells? Death.
First of all, browsers don't like empty table cells. Unexpected things happen... if you look at the page on the monitor, the empty cells cause the logos to slop over into the left bar. (Not good.)

__ If you look at the cells in the HTML editor, you see dozens and dozens of little cells generated to do nothing. (At right)
__ Nothing except pad the page with needless code, causing slower, browser-confusing loading time. Man, what a mess. You get the same problems with MS Front Page and Highway.


__ I've taken the liberty of suggesting a possible solution to consider. A table with only the number of cells you really need. The left table cell is a single Row-Span cell that runs the entire depth of the content area. It contains a single line of underscores, colorized red, with cell set "NO WRAP". This keeps the content moved over OFF the border. (If we must keep that border!) Now, there's a cell for each band logo, either right or left. Simple, functional, and rated to load in 14 seconds.
__ We've added a line of text there with each logo that will give a bit of a tease to the reader. Not all readers will be familiar with the bands, so a bit of "pull" may be in order. (Upsized version)
__ Always ask: "What visual signals am I sending to my readers?" The answer should be "The message I want them to get."
__ Does that red border send the desired visual signal? Why not?
__ Finally, there were real problems with the graphics. Some were tagged with different W/H sizes causing distorting. Two were so corrupted they had raster debris in them. (We left the corruption in the "Millencoln" logo for demo purposes.) Two were saved as GIF files, but called with .jpg extension, which can also cause browser problems on some systems. We had to re-save each graphic out of ImageReady to get them to behave on the final sample page.
__While I agree with Joyce about Tripod, I feel Darren is making an honest attempt to build a good fan site. Technical skills should never hinder the success of the site, which it does in this case.
I recommend a visit to NetMechanic, so you can be aware of specific mechanical problems. (BBEdit's HTML checker turned up, like, 75 HTML errors on this page!)
__We want Darren to be successful at what he wants to do... but his hard work may not be rewarded with readership and loyalty. Some technical tweaking will go a long way to delivering the reader experience that Darren intends to deliver.

Whew. I'm worn out.


<- Back to the Critiques Front Page

Submit your website for review . / . Select a Web site and share your views

Note: If you would like to contact the reviewer, please copy the reference into a request.



Become a WebDesign reviewer, or have your site reviewed...
If you would like to do more than just a casual online form review, perhaps with examples, screen shots and make-over suggestions, please contact us. A good eye for design is hard to find, and many people can learn from your input. In exchange for your efforts, the site owner will thank you, and you'll be recognized by all the readers of WebDesign & Review. To get started, forward your first review overview, or proposal directly to: Be sure to include the URL of the website you are reviewing. You can POST your review by using the Website Review Form as well. If you'd like to publish tips, tricks, reviews, opinions, or otherwise share your expertise in the pages of WebDesign & Review then capture and read our "Readers Guidelines".

VIEWS EXPRESSED IN READER REVIEWS ARE NOT NECESSARILY THE VIEWS OR OPINIONS OF WEB DESIGN & REVIEW. WHEN READING THESE REVIEWS PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE SITE MAY HAVE BEEN UPDATED OR RENNOVATED SINCE THE REVIEW WAS WRITTEN. ALL WEB SITE REVIEWS ARE OPINION BASED AND SHOULD BE ACCEPTED AS THAT. REVIEWS ARE IN NO WAY INTENDED TO RECOMMEND ANY SITE. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE VIEWED AS LEARNING TOOLS FOR IMPROVEMENT. Thank you for visiting WebDesign & Review at Notes: The screen shots herein represent the copyrighted works of their respective owners, and are used here for editorial demonstration purposes. Permission has been granted to display and review all sites in WebDesign & Review by the website owners. Please read and be aware of our Legal Properties & Disclaimers document. Not all areas of the online environment allow special characters such as the registration and trademark marks. This file will alert you to proprietary works that cannot be duplicated or distributed. Copyright 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 Showker Graphic Arts, for the The Design & Publishing Center, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. WebDesign & Review, Pixelsmith, WebEye are all trademarks for The Design & Publishing Center. Other products mentioned in these pages are the registered trademarks of their respective owners.