Design & Publishing . /
. WEB . /
. Critique . /
.9803 Site Review:
Design, Inc. page 2
Change the attack from 'vanity', "me-too" look to a challenge to the reader.
(back to original)
|Shift the meaning...
Obviously we want to lure the reader into the "designer" area so they can
begin looking at all the neat fashions. If this is the case, then "Decades"
is no longer important... we want those readers to drop right down to the button
for designers. Spell out the message right up front. We'll build sufficient desire
in the reader so they'll search for "where" to buy. In that initial gulp
we want them to get it. Period.
The change in type made the message more casual yet more demanding. We turned it
into a command. "You" get a look is far more compelling than "decades
get a look." Notice how that negative (or 'white') space keeps us moving down
the page into the content message. The slant reinforces gravity, helping the eye
back to the left.
- Breaking the dead-center orientation also reinforces the 'designer' theme...
keep in mind that centered structure involving type and rectangular shapes always
suggests more traditional, classic or conservative content. Somehow we didn't feel
this subject was anything near conservative.
The pages are too long. There's too much to load, and on some of the pages we're
stalled while the next picture comes down.
One reviewer, who responded to the "Reviews" invitation agreed...
"Just visited http://www.decadesinc.com/
I plan to visit other sites in
your list. I didn't like this site for a number of reasons.
* Slow to load, 150k of graphics on home page.
* Background pattern took too long to load. The
individual tiles where too small.
* The pictures on the home page didn't describe
to me what kind of cloathing is there.
* Needs pages that show what the clothing looks
like, on people.
Good observations, Kevin!
Additionally, let's not just show the clothing on people. How about a few insets
that show close-ups or details. Don't just show us a collection of designer stuff...
show us close-up shots so we can agree with the uniqueness of the articles. With
72dpi graphics, it is very difficult to successfully show something as complicated
as a garment. This is one of the best cases in favor of purchasing a digital camera
I've ever seen.
With these enhancements in mind we think Decades can live up to their interesting
story line, and rather unique visual offering to all web users.
'til next time... keep on surfing.
Design & Publishing . /
. WEB . /
Interested in having your web page critiqued? Send email to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Got a design or technique issue you'd like to write about?
If you'd like to publish in the pages of WebDesign & Review
then capture and read our "Readers
Guidelines" found here, or from our On-Demand Documents Desk
by sending e-mail to Info@Graphic-Design.com
...Put the word HOSPITALITY, and GUIDELINES in the subject area.
Thank you for visiting WebDesign & Review at
Notes: The screen shots herein represent the copyrighted works of their respective
owners, and are used here for editorial demonstration purposes. please read
and be aware of our Legal
Properties & Disclaimers document. Not all
areas of the online environment allow special characters such as the registration
and trademark marks. This file will alert you to proprietary works that cannot be
duplicated or distributed. Copyright 1996, 1997, 1998, Showker Graphic Arts, for
the The Design & Publishing Center, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. WebDesign & Review,
Pixelsmith, WebEye are all trademarks for The Design & Publishing Center. Other
products mentioned in these pages are the registered trademarks of their respective